ISRAEL's ELECTIONS are over and
a process of coalition building is underway. The NCF's Chief Media
Officer, Ms Deborah Pout, analysed the elections and their aftermath. We
circulate her conclusions:
The
recent Israeli elections saw Benjamin Netanyahu pull a clear and
impressive fourth victory from the jaws of defeat. The polls had been
narrowing between Netanyahu's Likud party and the opposition Zionist
Union party led by Yitzhak Herzog but many wrote off Netanyahu too
early. Netanyahu has been an adversary never to be underestimated and a
master of political wizardry throughout his career. Netanyahu's
victory was in part driven by personality and a populist
message. Netanyahu also skilfully managed to take votes from smaller
parties such as the right wing Yisrael Beiteinu party and Habayit
Hayehudi, the religious party. This election brought into
sharp focus how the israeli media and the pollsters got the elections
so wrong and failed to identify the underlying political trends amongst
the electorate which led to Netanyahu's victory.
Yitzhak Herzog was the John Kerry
of Israel's politics, an urbane, thoughtful intellectual who never
quite had the popular touch. The Zionist Union was a joint ticket with
Herzog's Labour Party (Hebrew: Avoda) and Hatnuah led by Tzipi Livni.
The alliance put Labour back on the Israeli political map with the
Zionist Union ending up with 24 seats (Labour itself only had 15 seats
in the last Knesset - it's 13 years since Labour were last able to play a
lead role in Israel's politics). The electorate did not like Herzog's
acceptance of Livni's condition that the Premiership would "rotate". All
the more so because of the perception amongst some sections of the
electorate rightly or wrongly that Livni had changed her political
allegiances on one too many occasion (jumping from party to party four
times in the space of four elections). Livni, a constant supporter of
the peace process, had started her political career in Likud.
The election of Netanyahu (he won
30 seats as opposed to the Zionist Union's 24) masks a range of
dissonant underlying trends. This election shows that Israel is in
practice now centre/right in its politics rather than hard right. One
new and important factor on the scene was The Joint List which united
Israel's Arab political parties on one ticket and thus became the third
largest party in Israel's Parliament, the Knesset, with 13 seats. The
new centrist party Kulanu (All of Us) founded by former Likud minister
Moshe Kahlon which champions socioeconomic issues gained an impressive
10 seats in the Knesset. Kahlon, a popular politician and rising star of
Israeli politics, could be a kingmaker in the formation of Netanyahu's
new government. The natural alliance for Netanyahu's Likud would be a
right wing coalition. But he may consider another option, that of a
"national unity" government together with Herzog and Livni. Such a
coalition might be an appealing option to Netanyahu as it would make his
government more attractive on the international stage. Such an option
is currently being examined in "back channels" though it will be very
hard to bring all of Labour (Avoda's) MPs to this wedding.
Interestingly Israel's public
opinion on a two state solution and the peace process continues to be
nuanced. The Israeli Democracy Institute which follows Israel's public
attitudes towards the peace process published a poll just before the
elections showing the contradictory attitudes of Israelis. Two thirds
of respondents expressed support for continuing to hold peace
negotiations but 65% of respondents said they did not believe such
negotiations would lead to peace in the coming years. Netanyahu is
still in the process of building his coalition which may of course be a
coalition of right wing parties. If so prospects for a meaningful
resumption of peace negotiations with the Palestinians seem slim while
Netanyahu is at the helm.
Netanyahu's fourth victory was greeted
with disappointment and disquiet in many quarters of the international
community who saw his re-election as signaling the end of any hopes for
a renewed peace process with the Palestinians while he leads
Israel. During the last days of his increasingly desperate campaign,
Netanyahu declared his opposition to a Palestinian State (a change from
his Bar Ilan speech and a position he quickly recanted after his
victory.) Netanyahu correctly calculated that there were votes to be
won by outflanking the right on this issue. Netanyahu's current
position on a Palestinian state seems to be that with the perceived weak
leadership of President Abbas it would be a target for regional
predators including Hamas from Gaza, "Islamic State" (ISIS) from the
East and Hizbollah which is Iran's proxy to the North. Iran's nuclear
programme is also seen as a severe threat, making it very unlikely that a
two state solution can be achieved.
Netanyahu's
bloody and costly military campaign in Gaza in the summer of 2014 also
came in for criticism domestically and condemnation internationally. It
should be noted that Netanyahu's popularity initially increased during
the military operation in Gaza. Netanyahu used this to his political
advantage by cultivating his image as the only experienced and
responsible leader currently in Israeli politics. His poll ratings fell
after the summer and Netanyahu's leadership came under increasing
political attack.
A leaked EU document claimed that the
deadlock in Israeli/Palestinian negotiations and continuing settlement
expansion had left Jerusalem on the brink of 'polarisation and
violence'. Some Fatah politicians have expressed fears that
frustrations on the Palestinian street may boil over into a Third
Intifada. Palestinian protests did turn violent last summer over
Israel's
actions in Gaza and the building of more settlements. These issues
didn't seem to play a prominent role in the recent Israeli elections
even though there were some attacks on Israelis in Jerusalem and the
West Bank. There have
been murmurings that Netanyahu may revive and continue Ariel Sharon's
policy of a one sided separation from the Palestinians in the West Bank. But it is unlikely that Netanyahu will be able to implement such unilateral moves either politically or militarily.
The main
obstacle to a peace process will be the possible formation of a right
wing coalition. Therefore if he did return to the negotiating table
over a peace process and achieved a deal he wouldn't have the majority
in parliament to implement it.
On the international stage Netanyahu's
policies and diplomacy have led to US/Israeli relations being at an all
time low. Many within the Israeli political and security establishment
fear that Netanyahu's leadership is jeopardising Israel's national
interest. They believe his reckless diplomacy vis à vis the
United States is threatening Israel's most important strategic
relationship. The election campaign saw Netanyahu's leadership come in
for an unprecedented chorus of public criticism from numerous former
senior security officials who called for his ousting as Prime Minister.
Netanyahu has indicated he will use his new term in office to try and
mend relations with the Obama administration but it may be too little
too late. The levels of mistrust and rancour between Netanyahu and
Obama are well documented. Many within Israel's political and security
establishment are concerned that Netanyahu's diplomatic collision course
with Obama has weakened Israel's ability to be heard in Washington over
the country's legitimate concerns regarding the US/Iranian nuclear
deal. Israel will also be coming under further scrutiny with attempts to
isolate the country diplomatically now that the Palestinians have
joined the International Criminal Court and may seek to indict Israelis for war crimes.
The Israeli media and Netanyahu's
political opponents thought that the election would be a referendum on
Netanyahu’s fitness for the job of Prime Minister. They were sure that
the Israeli public was fed up with his rhetoric and lack of ability to
deal with the crucial issues. The results prove they were right in their
analysis but wrong in their conclusions. When Israelis headed to the
polls and had to decide between Herzog and Netanyahu they didn't really
see any alternative. There is a
huge difference between the way the Israeli Prime Minister is seen by
his political opponents and the international community, as opposed to
how he is seen by ordinary Israeli citizens. In short, the election results mean that
Netanyahu's attention will be primarily focused on domestic
socioeconomic issues including the housing crisis and the increased cost
of living as well as other internal issues.
For many Netanyahu's re-election
signals more of the same but in the world of Middle Eastern politics if
there is one certainty it is uncertainty.